More Pages: Canadian Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95


Interesting and easily readable, but quite dated now.

Mackenzie beat Lewis and Clark to the Pacific

Wonderful and informative poetry

Grandma Loves It

We fought in the war, too, Eh???Back in Canada, Melady shares stories of the rush to enlist..one fella with a scar from his neck to to his naval who claimed it was for an appendectomy; another guy in the medical corps, who told the psychiatrists he liked to go out at night and strangle sheep.
But by far the most intriguing story is that of the mysterious Dr. Cyr, aka Fred Demara. From March to October 1951 this fellow masqueraded as Surgeon-Lieutenant Cyr and practiced medicine (admittedly often by stealing a look at a textbook or soliciting help from other medics) on the Cayuga for six months, even managing to pull one of the Captains teeth. Eventually, the real Dr. Cyr, back in New Brunswick, happened to read a story about himself in the newspaper. The ruse fell apart shortly afterwords.
Still, the book is not all jest and off-the-cuff irony. Princess Patricias Canadian Light Infantry fought gallantly and tragically at Kapyong-ni in early 1951, preventing a breach in the UN lines and perhaps the fall of Seoul (again). For this they were awarded the Presidential Citation for 'Outstanding Heroism'-- the only Canadians to ver receive this award. Quite an accomplishment for soldiers who, a few months before, were afraid the War would be over before they arrived in Korea.


Don't just sit there, buy a ticket AND this book.

A useful introduction to Cohen's biography.The only criticism is that it is too sycophantic. Best example of this is the awe with which Leonard's university reading list is presented - Everybody Knows students don't read a quarter of the books they should, preferring to lead The Smokey Life instead. But if He's Your Man then it is worth a read.


Les Belles-Soeurs: if you understand French, read the book

Ready, Aye ReadyThe story is nothing less than one of transformation. From its 'miniscule' starting point in 1939, the RCN was by 1945 the fourth largest navy in the world, with nearly 500 ships in commission. Almost all of those had been constructed during the war in Canadian shipyards, which also were able to turn out more than 400 critically needed merchant vessels for the North Atlantic convoys. Thousands of men and women who had no experience with the sea were turned into a disciplined and efficient fighting force, building a war record of which any nation could be proud.
While not intended as a comprehensive history of fleet actions, 'The Longest Battle' nevertheless tells its story effectively. In the battle of the North Atlantic, German U-boats and Canadian ships squared off without ceasing from the start of the war to the final surrender -- hence the title, 'The Longest Battle.' The fighting often surged into Canada's own waters, sometimes as far west as the St Lawrence River itself.
Harbron also gives us a brief but descriptive look at the various classes of Canadian warships, the growth of the merchant navy, the history of the Wrens (officially, Women's Royal Canadian Naval Service, or WRCNS), and, interestingly, a chapter about the RCN's antagonists, the U-boats and their crews. There is also a touching section telling the stories of two RCN families and their wartime experiences.
Harbron also argues that the transformation of the RCN had a lasting effect on Canada's society. In the 1940s, Canada was far more British, culturally and ethnically, than it is today. He writes, 'Canadian nationalism was reborn in the wartime mess decks of the Royal Canadian Navy. In September 1939 the tiny Canadian navy went to war as a pliant auxiliary of the [British] Royal Navy. In May 1945, it emerged at the peace as a full-blown, confident Canadian national institution in which Canadians from all our geographic regions and many ethnic communities had been drawn together in a common cause' (p. 19).
A book this size can only skim the surface of all there is to tell about its subject. But packed as it is with great photos and informed, personal writing, it does credit to the ships, their crews, and the navy that at a time of crisis lived up to its stirring motto, 'Ready, Aye Ready.'


Chuckles to laughter....good for you!
But Creighton's book is more than a conventional biography. It tries to make history come to life. Indeed, Creighton wrote Macdonald's biography in the shape of a novel, which means that the only quotations in the book are either from newspaper articles or from letters written by, to, or about John A. Macdonald. No secondary work is quoted in the entire book, even though it appears that Creighton read extensively on the subject before writing his book. The book includes endnotes, but it does not read like a conventional history book. The novel-like approach used by Creighton makes the book a pleasure to read. Creighton succeeds in making Canadian history interesting.
However, Creighton's book is also representative of its time, and representative of Creighton's personal beliefs. Creighton, who died in 1979, was known as a Canadian nationalist with strong anti-American tendencies. His choice of John A. Macdonald as a subject rather than, for example, William Lyon MacKenzie King (another famous Canadian Prime Minister), might be explained by the fact that Macdonald was himself a nationalist. Macdonald once declared: "A British subject I was born, a British subject I will die," and his famous National Policy, which favoured the development of the Canadian West and which introduced high tariffs on American goods, is still considered as one of the most nationalistic policies ever applied in Canada. Creighton, therefore, chose Macdonald as topic because of the similarities between their political positions. Therefore, Creighton is sympathetic to Macdonald throughout the book. Creighton's position regarding French-Canadian nationalism and Quebec separatism (he saw them as disruptive elements that weakened his beloved Canada against the United States) also had an impact on how the book was written, which is particularly evident when he writes about the two Metis rebellions in a rather unsympathetic way.
Also, the novel-like type of writing does have a disadvantage: it only allows the reader to know a single view on Macdonald. Historical books written in the conventional manner often include different positions on a single event, but in the case of Creighton's book, the narrative strength of the novel simply cannot include more than one version, since the sweeping narrative would otherwise be broken up by different views, and the book could consequently lose all of its appeal.
In summary, because the book has a clear bias in favour of Macdonald, and because it has not aged well (this style of writing is not used anymore by historians, because of the limitations it creates, the sacrifice of impartiality in favour of a continuous narrative form), I believe it does not deserve a full mark. On the other side, Creighton's book is interesting to read as an example of the historical research method of its time. And I must also admire Creighton's skill for making history come to life. We must thank him for his use of a writing style that makes Canadian history accessible to the larger public. And the caricatures by the Canadian cartoonist Bengough, that are present throughout the book, are an extra treat.